Skip to main content

Full text of "fort monroe"

See other formats


The Army 

TADLP 

Distributed Learning 
Program 


Distributed Learning Council of 

Colonels 

27 October 2005 


COL Jim Markley 

Director-Training Development And Delivery Directorate 
TRADOC Program Integration Officer 

The Army Distributed Learning 

Program 


Agenda 


• Overarching Architecture C2 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 2 


Issue & Recommendation 


Lack of overarching architecture and program coordination 
for training related information systems (IS). 

•A number of IS's are being fielded, enhanced or maintained to 
satisfy some part of the Systems Approach to Training (SAT) 
through the Army's Training Information Architecture (ATIA) 

•Currently there are as many management structures as there 
are systems, each with their own set of requirements and 
funding 

•TADLP TPIO should be designated to lead effort to bring all 
relevant training information systems together under one 
common architecture 

Recommendation: Use existing dL CoC membership to comprise 
a Configuration and Requirements Control Board (CRCB) to 
reconcile and align system requirements, interfaces and 
configurations. DA G3 and TPIO TADLP co-chair the CRCB. 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 3 


Current Status of Army Training Related Information Systems 


Design / 
Evaluation 




Current Status of Army Training IS's 


•As depicted on the previous slide there are numerous training related 
IS's that fulfill some part of the functional requirements of SAT and 
ATIA 

•The majority of these systems operate within independent acquisition 
programs and combat developers and with uncoordinated 
requirements 

•This has led to numerous examples of redundant development 
efforts, redundant requirements and duplicative functionality 

•Most prominent examples of IS's with un-reconciled requirements that 
are directly related to SAT: 

•TDDT- Combat developer TDADD; materiel developer ATSC & PEO 
STRI 

•AIMS PC- Combat developer TOMA; materiel developer ATSC 

•ALMS- Combat developer TPIO TADLP; materiel developer PM DLS 

•DTMS- Combat developer CAC; materiel developer CAC 

•OnSchedule- Combat developer APG; materiel developer APG 

™ s,ide5 


Council of Cojon^ 


Army Training Information System Vision 


Design / 
Evaluation 




Army Training Information System Vision 

•As depicted on the previous slide the ATIS vision is a system of 
systems approach to aligning requirements, functionality and 
interfaces between both training related IS's and non-training related 
IS's (ATRRS, BCKS, RCAS, RPAS) 

•This system of systems approach requires: 

•Single architecture (operational & system view) 

•Consolidated requirements databases (functional & system) 

•Single configuration and requirements change business process 

•Agreement between 06's responsible for various programs 

•The system of systems approach will achieve the following: 

•Reduction of expenditures on redundant or duplicative 
functionality 

•Single data repositories 

•Automated exchange of critical data between systems 
•Streamlined interfaces 


council ot Bfifkiiiencies in sysfcem/vr/efate leadership October 2005 slide? 


Chief, dL: 

LTC Frank Anderson 
757-788-5563 
DSN 680-5563 

andersonfh@monroe.army.mil 


Questions? 

Director: 

COL Jim Markley 
757-788-5700 
DSN 680-5700 


lames.ma 
onroe.ar 


Chief dL Support: 

LTC Mark Lynch 
757-788-5680 
DSN 680-5680 

mark.lynch@monroe.army.mil 


Policy & Requirements, & DLD 
Deputy Chief: 

Mr. Paul McCarthy 

757-788-5536 

DSN 680-5536 

mccarthyp@monroe.army.mil 


Council of Colonels 


( ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


CLXXI Program Integration 
Chief: 

Ms. Glenna Dobie 
757-788-5542 
DSN 680-5542 
dobieg@monroe.army.mil 


n ue r ane r 2uub a i ine a 


Dr. Connie Wardell 
Director - Individual 
Training Support, 
Army Training Support 

Center 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 9 


Agenda 


• Resolve Technical Difficulty Issues 

• Task-based Development 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 10 


dL CoC Web-Based dL 
Technology Issues 

Issue/Problem: Soldiers have difficulty accessing/playing web-based distributed learning because of 
technical issues 

Desired Council Action 

- Form a group of NETCOM, TRADOC, and Reserve representatives to resolve how to deliver web-based training to the 
Soldier with fewer technical issues 

Key Assumption: 

- Web-based delivery of training is a timely, cost effective, instructionally sound way of delivering needed training to 
Soldiers 

- 90% of delivery issues are related to technical or administrative assistance for Soldiers. 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 11 


dL CoC Web-Based dL 
Technology Issues 

Key Discussion Points 

s Soldiers in OCONUS locations have difficulty accessing 
web-based training if not on a .mil domain 

s Soldiers (CONUS and OCONUS) often cannot download 
needed plug-ins required to run the web-based 
courseware on the .mil domain 

s Each installation offers unique difficulties when 
Soldiers take training based on particular DOIM's 
security firewalls and restrictions 

s When traffic is heavy on the NIPRNET, executing 
training can be so slow that it is ineffective 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 12 


dL CoC Web-Based dL Technology 

Issues 


Issue 

Description 

Possible Solutions 

Firewall 

s 

• Prevent students access 
to web-based dL material; 
both CONUS and OCONUS 
from other than military 
domain (home or private 
ISP) 

• Ports are closed that 
allow for streaming video 

• Host web-based training outside 
of the NIPRNET 

• Find ways to reroute training 
(open specific ports) 

• Continue to investigate work 
arounds (i.e. CD ROM) 

DOIM 

• There are no service 
wide standard rules for 
DOIM operation. Each 
DOIM may apply more 
stringent rules 

• DOIM blocks access of 
key training plug-ins (i.e. 
RealPlayer) 

• DOIM restricts loading of 
certain plug-ins to 
Government computers 
(i.e. nGrain) 

• Have NETCOM standardize DOIM 
operations with training 
community 

• Find way to reroute training 
(open specific ports) 

• Work with NETCOM to certify 
loading of plug-ins for all DOIMs 


Council. 


dL CoC Task-Based Development 


Issue/Problem: Past development and fielding of dL 
courseware has not been timely in meeting training requirements 
of Soldiers. Current TADLP funding is being used only for 
courses/phases of courses. Fielding is done when the total course 
is accepted. 


Desired Council Action - Provide method for obtaining critical 
tasks for task-based training development. 


Key Assumptions: 

- Timely delivery of dL products is critical for operational readiness of 
Soldiers and positioning the Army for transformation to ARFORGEN. 

- Focus on task development related to: 

s Battle Command Knowledge System (BCKS) requirements with focus 
on the Operational Domain. 

s The 39/9 tasks directed by CSA. 
s Safety Issues. 

^ Feedback from CALL. 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 14 


dL CoC Task-Based Development 

Key Discussion Points: (Proposed development strategy) 

■s Task-based development should take no more than 3 
months to develop. 

^ Field 'good enough' tasks using the first 10-30 Soldiers as 
the validation population. 

^ Correct errors and validation comments before 
acceptance of courseware as final. 

s Provide Soldier credit for taking tasks that are a part of a 
course. 

^ Put tasks together to form courses, when appropriate. 

^ Reuse tasks in other courses, where appropriate. 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 15 


dL CoC Task-Based 
Development 

• Status of Proof of Principle: 

- Graphical User Interface for all tasks is complete 

- Contract template was used for contracting 2 
tasks 

- 2 in-house and 2 contracted tasks are under 
development 

- Operational Concept Document and Test Plan are 
developed 

- Evaluation Plan is being developed 

• Way Ahead: 

- Tasks completed and initial fielding - Dec 05 

- Validation of tasks and evaluation of PoP - Jan 06 

- Results/Report Out - Feb 06 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 16 


BACKUP 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 17 


Issue/RQMT to be Briefed MDEP: 

XXXX MACOM/PROPONENT: 


Discussion: Student services 
receives reports from Soldiers 
that they cannot access web- 
based training and/or they can 
not download plug-ins required to 
run the training. Timely training 
is needed by Soldiers. Soldiers 
need easy access to the most up- 
to-date training available as soon 

Funding $000K type & amt of 


quit. 

-92 

03 

04 

05 

06 

07 

08 

09 

OMA 









RDTE 









OPA 










MDEP POC 


Risk Assessment- Check one & 

[ ekplain:_ 

□ Tier 0 Can accept no risk 
0 Tier 1 Can accept little risk 

□ Tier 2 Can accept some risk 

Tier 3 Carracc&pt TTTutferdte risl 

RECOMMENDATION: 

Form a group of NETCOM, TRADOC, 
and Reserve representatives to 
resolve how to deliver web-based 
training t o the Sol dier with fewer 

te^&^j'BWSfpprove dL 


CoC 


Brief Y or N) 

Comment 


QUAD# 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 18 


Issue/RQMT to be Briefed MDEP: 
MACOM/PR O PON ENT: 


XXXX 


Discussion: Current fielding of 
dL courseware is not meeting timely 
training requirements of Soldiers. 
TAdLP funding is only for 
courses/phases of courses. PoP will 
evaluate task-based development 
approach before full implementation. 
Delivery orders will be modified and 
vetted through Technical Change 



cy i in. 

-02 

03 

04 

05 

06 

07 

08 

09 

OMA 









RDTE 









OPA 










Risk Assessment- Check one & 

[ ekplain:_ 

□ Tier 0 Can accept no risk 
0 Tier 1 Can accept little risk 

□ Tier 2 Can accept some risk 

REMlMW^ derafe r/Si 

Based on results of the PoP for Task- 
Based Development, move forward 
with task-based development and 
incremental fielding of tasks. Approve 
use of TAdLP funds for either 
courses/phases or unit training 


Approve/Disapprove dL 

CoC 


Brief Y or N) 

Comment 



MDEP 


POC 


QUAD# 


Council of Colonels 


i } TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 19 



Summary 

Benefits of The Army Distributed Learning 
Program: 

•Improves readiness - supports an Army at War! 

•Continuous training environment throughout 
career 

•Foundation for Lifelong Learning 

•Provides training anytime, anywhere; reduces 
time soldiers are away from unit/home 

•Training efficiencies leveraged through 
multimedia and immersive training products 

•Standardized Reserve Component and Active 
Component training 


Council of Colonels 


i ) TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND 


27 October 2005 slide 20